Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
A place for musings about everything under the high summer sun
The Cubs will return in April to, well, start all over again. Happy New Year!
About Me
- Dave
- I'm a writer. I'm an author. (Wait, isn't that the same thing? Oh, never mind.) I'm a Cubs fan (the cross I must bear). I'm a liver transplant recipient (the greatest favor in the world). I'm a professional smartass. I make a mean plate of scrambled eggs.
Twitter Updates
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(81)
-
▼
March
(17)
- Wing-a-ding-ding!
- What the Puck?
- Finally, the Final Four
- Commercials that are just WRONG
- Devil in a (turtle) shell! Run! Run!
- I saw a screening of "Sin City" last night
- Congressional Steroid Hearings - Strikeout
- My Final Four picks
- Breaking: Robert Blake not guilty
- Jose Canseco, the 'fraidy cat?
- Proof that the U.S.-Mexico relationship may be in ...
- "Napoleon Dynamite"
- Crime doesn't pay ...
- Chicago Cubs 2005: That's a Wrap?
- A sequel to "Cheaper by the Dozen"?
- Steve Stone
- Well, here we go ...
-
▼
March
(17)
Links
1 comment:
Well, seeing as how the State had some huge gaping holes in their case, particularly in the area of hard physical evidence, it's good to know that the jurors were paying attention.
My suspicion is that Blake may well have had something to do with the death of his wife, but the State took the position that HE pulled the trigger. The evidence they presented to the court just does not support that scenario, if anything it actually served to disprove Blake as the triggerman. Apparently the LA County Prosector failed to review the lessons of the first Simpson Trial.
The question now is whether Robert Blake will follow Simpon's trail and journey into the wasteland of the social pariah, or will his exoneration make him fit once again for polite society?
--ryan
Post a Comment